作者/Author(s): John K. Culver and Sarah Kirchberger
網站來源/Source: Atlantic Council
日期/Date: June 15, 2023
關鍵字/Keywords: Deterrence
雙方對遏制戰略學到的教訓有所矛盾
- 對美國來說,有關中國的這些教訓,最終導致了一種遏制陷阱。
- 如果美國堅信中國將在未來幾年內奪回台灣,美國就會強迫台灣做好準備,削弱其在安全援助方面的自我約束,踩踏中國的紅線。
- 另一方面,中國通過對台軍事演習,或具有戰爭意圖的挑釁行動,不斷變更其衝突紅線。
- 美國和台灣必須避免加劇兩岸緊張局勢,維持穩定現狀。
- 西方必須向對手發出強烈信號,更果斷地防止兩岸衝突的發生。
政策建議
- 美國及其盟國必須迅速分析,理解遏止在烏克蘭失敗的原因。
- 中國極有可能使用非動能軍事行動征服台灣,這是西方難以解決的問題。
- 制定方法以應對中國對台資訊戰。
- 打擊中國和俄羅斯針對全球南方國家的「反殖民」和「反霸權」論述。
- 西方不應對輕易就能夠瓦解中俄關係抱有太多期望。
- 西方應共享情報以加強可信度和團結。
- 歐洲盟國可為全球安全做出重大貢獻。因此,美國應盡可能解決他們的擔憂。
Implications of Conflicting Lessons for Deterrence
- The lessons for the US are conflicting for China, resulting in a deterrence trap.
- If the US strongly believes China will retake Taiwan in the next few years, the US will press Taiwan to prepare better, eroding its self-imposed restraints on security assistance and stepping on China's red lines.
- On the other hand, China kept changing its red lines by conducting military drills or provocative actions short of war on Taiwan.
- The US and Taiwan must preserve a stable status quo without increasing cross-strait tension.
- The West must send strong signals to adversaries and be more decisive to avert cross-strait conflict.
Policy Recommendations
- The US and its allies must quickly analyze and understand why deterrence failed in Ukraine.
- China will most likely use non-kinetic means to conquer Taiwan, which is difficult to address for the West.
- Formulate ways to counter Chinese information warfare over Taiwan.
- Counter Chinese and Russian "anti-colonial" and "anti-hegemonial" narratives targetting global south countries.
- The West should not expect to fracture Sino-Russian ties easily.
- The West should share intelligence to bolster credibility and unity.
- European allies can contribute significantly to global security. Therefore, the US should address their concerns as much as possible.