FP: 你應該要多麼恐懼中國?
作者:Stephen M. Walt
來源:Foreign Policy
日期:Aug 7, 2023
摘要:
中國觀察家對於中國當前的全球影響力和由此產生的地緣政治氛圍有不同的意見。本文對觀察家應該如何關注中國進行了一些評估。
來源:Foreign Policy
日期:Aug 7, 2023
摘要:
中國觀察家對於中國當前的全球影響力和由此產生的地緣政治氛圍有不同的意見。本文對觀察家應該如何關注中國進行了一些評估。
中國經濟發展表現好嗎?
- 經濟實力決定國際政治中的實力。雖然中國在 COVID-19 之前經濟繁盛,但現在同時面對人口減少和老齡化、青年失業率高、債務纏身等問題,因此經濟發展停滯不前。大多數觀察家對中國的長期經濟增長持悲觀態度。
- 遏制中國經濟可能很危險,因為中國早已在全球經濟中深深扎根,未來也將繼續是主要的經濟參與者。
美國的出口管制能否成功?
- 拜登對中國的科技戰旨在保護美國科技霸權和安全。但從更廣泛的角度來看,它的措施旨在遏制中國的科技增長。
- 短期內使用脫鉤戰術可能有效,但此舉也可能會鼓勵中國加速實現自給自足,使未來再也無法使用出口管制策略。
- 出口管制可能有效,但同時也會增加目標國的敵意。中國已經對不少美國企業和那些友美的企業進行報復。
- 如果美國延長出口管制措施並影響到其他經濟體,與中國經濟關係密切的國家可能會對美國不滿。
習近平是哪種類型的專制主義者?
- 習近平已經積累了大量的權力,成為自1949年以來中國權力最集中的領導人。
- 威權領導者容易做出導致國家衰退的糟糕決策,但也有明智的威權者推動國家前進的例子。
- 習近平成功地改善了中國的國內治理和全球影響力。然而,隨著他的掌控逐漸緊縮,他的判斷錯誤率也會提高,例如COVID-19的管理以及對國內科技公司的控制方面,都是相對失敗的例證。
亞洲能否達成有效的平衡
- 中國未能阻止其鄰國向美國靠攏,並在領海問題上表現出侵略性,使得這些鄰國對北京更加防備。
- 亞洲要形成對抗中國的集體平衡是可能的,但過程極具挑戰性,部分國家想在與美國結盟的同時,還能維持與中國市場的進出口貿易。這些國家也希望避免成為美中衝突中的附帶損失。
其他國家將如何回應?
- 許多國家寧願採取避險策略,避免捲入美中衝突。
- 也有一些國家希望利用此次衝突,同時從美中兩邊取得利益。
Summary:
Containing China's economy may be dangerous as it is deep-rooted in the global economy, and it will remain a major economic player.
Can the US export control succeed?
- Biden's technology war against China protects US technology supremacy and security. Yet, from a broader aspect, its measures were to contain China's technological growth.
- Decoupling may work for the short term, but it may encourage China to achieve self-reliance faster, making export controls ineffective in the long term.
- Export control may work, but it will increase hostility from the target. China is already retaliating against US firms and those who were friendly with the US.
- Countries with strong economic ties with China might berate the US if it prolongs the export control measures and affects other economies.
What type of authoritarian is Xi Jinping?
- Xi has amassed power that sees him become China's most powerful leader since 1949.
- Authoritarian leaders are prone to poor decision-making that leads to a country's demise, but there are instances of wise authoritarians that push the country forward.
- Xi succeeded in improving China's domestic governance and global influence. However, he is more error-prone as his grip tightens, demonstrated by the case of COVID-19 mismanagement and controls on domestic tech companies.
Will Asia balance effectively?
- China failed to prevent its neighbors from aligning closer to the US and became more wary of Beijing after practicing "wolf-warrior" diplomacy and acting aggressively in territorial waters.
- Collective balancing against China is possible but challenging as some countries want to align with the US for security while maintaining market access to China. These countries also avoid becoming collateral damage in the US-China conflict.
How would the rest of the world respond?
- Many countries prefer a hedging strategy and avoid being involved deeply in the US-China conflict.
- Some countries also hope to manipulate the conflict and gain benefits from both sides.